Showing posts with label Supplements. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Supplements. Show all posts

Saturday, 30 November 2024

Drug Repurposing - a great introduction

This week's Yes to Life show on Health Radio with Robin Daly talks to Jane McLelland - she is the wonderful pioneer whose groundbreaking book first introduced this topic to a wider audience. 

"Knowledge about drugs intended for one purpose that actually have beneficial effects in another, say cancer, has been around for a long time, but the lack of financial incentives in off-patent drugs has meant that the research has generally collected dust – until, that is, Jane’s need to survive terminal cancer spurred her into a deep dive into the medical literature."

The show also looks at the Somatic theory of cancer vs the metabolic approach - often the root of why many oncologists are so dismissive of an integrative approach. We so need oncologists and more to understand where those of us taking an integrative approach are coming from.


Listen to the Jane McLelland show at: https://yestolife.org.uk/radio_shows/drug-repurposing/

This Yes to Life radio show is well worth a listen every week - you can also listen back on all the previous shows (8 years worth) with many other pioneers in an integrative approach - see: https://yestolife.org.uk/radio-shows/

See my very short interview with her from 2018:

Update 1/2/25: Cancer Choices blog about repurposed drugs in 2025: https://cancerchoices.org/repurposed-drugs-in-cancer-care/
And their look at Fenbendazole and Cancer:

Friday, 29 November 2024

High-dose IV vitamin C plus chemo doubles survival in advanced pancreatic cancer

Research this month concludes: "A randomized, phase 2 clinical trial shows that adding high-dose, intravenous (IV) vitamin C to chemotherapy doubles the overall survival of patients with late-stage metastatic pancreatic cancer from eight months to 16 months. The finding adds to mounting evidence of the benefits of high-dose, IV vitamin C in treating cancer."
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241118125040.htm#google_vignette

Wow as author Jane McLelland says: "Who has been told by their doctor not to waste your money on intravenous vitamin C? This study should be HEADLINES in every paper as it DOUBLES survival times. If it were a patented drug the excitement would be intense....My lowest ever cancer markers when I had stage 4 was when I took a combination of dugs/supplements with IVC. IVC should not be considered "alternative" it should be considered as a standard treatment.....IVC works by increasing #ferroptosis which you are not allowed to know about as my second edition which discusses this topic is still deemed 'offensive' by @amazon and is still not reinstated. Shame on you. Pancreatic cancer is one of the worst diagnoses."

Monday, 21 October 2024

Sea Moss, Iodine and more

So last year I read ‘The Iodine Crisis: What You Don't know About Iodine Can Wreck Your Life’ by Lynne Farrow. It wasn’t a wonderfully written book but it did reintroduce me to the fact that many of us maybe not getting enough iodine. The book for example notes that rates of iodine consumption have dropped 50% since the 1970s.

The book goes onto suggest a possible causal link that “decreased iodine consumption corresponds with the dramatic rise in breast cancer, prostate cancer and thyroid disease.” It also has a huge number of personal ‘iodine stories’ about the wonders of iodine; this maybe useful to some but I am always a little wary of lists of personal stories, preferring more the research - having said that the book also covers some of the research.


Back in early 2019 I had a urine Iodine test with Genova that showed 15 ug/L (0.12 umol/L). This was considered very low by some nutritionists who say that less than 20 is severe deficiency. However there are disagreements among scientists about what are correct levels. Indeed in Japan it has been shown that they may well be having 100 times higher rates of iodine in their diet than the West!


Back in 2019, as I noted in this blog, I did supplement with Lugol’s solution; this has the two types of iodine that the body uses and it was used with people around Chernobyl after the disaster.


When I re-tested the iodine in 2020 I was just over normal levels so stopped supplementation and used occasional seaweed flakes - more of that in a mo. Certainly all practitioners say you need to test to check iodine levels before supplementing. Interestingly following radiation treatment a hair analysis (a technique that some dismiss as inaccurate or even bogus) in December 2021 showed low levels again of iodine. I don’t seem to have got to grips with how much to take and would in retrospect have considered increasing iodine intake during and after radiation.


In that earlier 2019 blog I quoted a doctor, Michael B. Schachter, saying, “Iodine may be needed in individualized doses to improve thyroid function, immune function, and the optimal functioning of all the cells in the body; several associated nutrients need to be given including vitamin C, selenium, magnesium, unrefined salt, and sufficient water; these help to prevent strong detoxification reactions as a result of the release of bromine from the tissues when iodine is given in milligram quantities. These higher milligram doses rather than microgram doses help to enhance anti-cancer functions in most if not all cancers, but certainly in cancers of the thyroid, breast, ovary, and prostate.”


Iodine kills cancer cells


The Canceractive website notes: “Research studies show that iodine can kill cancer cells and cancer stem cells, improve the oxygenation of cells, improve metabolic function and enhance the immune system in its search for rogue and pre-cancer cells. 88% of people have been shown to be seriously deficient in iodine on cancer diagnosis. Having good iodine levels can reduce pathogen levels, and lower the risk of anaemia. Importantly, it can upregulate an inactive p53 gene so that it causes cancer cell death. Iodine deficiency is known to cause pre-cancerous fibrocystic disease, which can lead to breast cancer. Iodine supplementation can maintain breast health. Prostate cancer and colorectal cancer patients have also clear and recorded benefits from the supplementation of iodine”. Read more including references to research in Canceractive’s January 2024 article: https://www.canceractive.com/article/iodine-and-cancer


Thyroid disease is associated with an increased prostate cancer risk. A healthy prostate will have a concentration of Iodine according to a Canadian study; it was found that there were 29% less prostate cases in the group with high iodine, when compared with those men with low iodine. While other research has shown that prostate cancer cells take up iodine easily and it can cause apoptosis. Yay!


Of course this research needs to be repeated before we can be more certain but it indicates to me that we should be taking the issue of our iodine intake more seriously.


Why iodine depletion?


There is a short chapter in Lynne Farrow’s book looking at the role of the iodine-blocking element bromine and how it has ‘purged iodine from our bodies’. Bromine is found in pesticides, fire retardants, plastic packaging, drugs, some baked products and soft drinks. Bromides are also now added to flour; whereas iodine was added to bread prior to the 1980s.


Fluoridation and chlorine both displace iodine in the body – so our water supplies can deplete levels along with toothpaste, mouthwash and more. Lastly soil depletion’s meant lower levels of iodine and we also now consume less iodine-rich foods like prawns, sea fish, eggs and iodised salt.


What to take?


Well it seems to me that we must test before supplementation with iodine using for example Lugol’s or Nascent Iodine - also of course check with your Oncology team. 


The other option is seaweed. One of the challenges is to get pure and heavy metal free seaweeds that don’t come from near Fukushima. Some Sea Kelp does come in tablet form but again I would be wary of over-dosing. I use Dulse and other seaweed flakes - adding them to stews, soups and more. However after revisiting this topic I will try to use it a bit more often!


Sea Moss


This seaweed is sometimes referred to as Irish Moss although several websites distinguish between the two. The Irish is more rare and allegedly has similar but slightly more health benefits. 


Sea Moss, according to conversations I’ve had here in Gloucestershire, seems to have been used in African Caribbean communities in relation to cancer; it is found along the rocky coasts of the Caribbean and has been used there in traditional medicine for centuries. It is an edible red seaweed and it is said can have 92 out of the 102 vitamins and minerals the body needs to function! It is said Sea Moss is packed with cancer-fighting nutrients, including antioxidants, fucoxanthin, polyphenols, and others. One of those nutrients is iodine and this may well also explain it’s benefit.


Organic Nature’s blog summarises the research re prostate cancer: “Sea moss and other seaweeds are excellent for men's health. They're a rich source of zinc, an essential mineral for the prostate to function correctly. Besides, sea moss's natural anti-inflammatory properties participate in reducing inflammation of the prostate. Ultimately, by improving male prostate health and function, sea moss may help reduce the occurrence of prostate cancers in men. Current investigation about the anti-prostate cancer properties of marine-derived compounds confirms that “marine species are unique and have great potential for the discovery of anti-cancer drugs.’”


A friend of mine in Stroud recently gave me a pot of her homemade Sea Moss - it is gloopy and some find that hard to eat - here’s a recipe if you want to try yourself: https://jamaicaherbal.com/blogs/herbal-secrets/sea-moss-benefits-rid-the-body-of-mucus-and-supply-essential-nutrients


As a final point on Sea Moss and seaweeds it is important to say research is very limited and iodine levels vary widely so it is hard too assess what might be a safe ‘dose’ - and clearly would not be safe for some people like those with hypothyroidism. Get advice!


Carrageenan concerns


Carrageenan is derived from red algae or seaweeds and is widely used in the food industry - however it is surrounded by controversy. There are many who consider that it is itself a health risk and indeed I personally make a point of avoiding it in foods. One example is that it is often in non-dairy milks - check out Plenish as they don’t use it and only keep to as few ingredients as possible.


I mention Carrageenan here as it is often confused with Sea Moss but they are not the same. Check out this blog that explains why: https://www.organicsnature.co/blogs/news/carrageenan-in-sea-moss-safety


Read more here re Carrageenan: https://draxe.com/nutrition/what-is-carrageenan/


Here’s Dr Gregor on seaweed and treats cancer: https://nutritionfacts.org/video/which-seaweed-is-most-protective-against-breast-cancer/


Phew another blog that became much longer than intended! To finish here’s a 4minute film from ten years ago looking at this issue with Dr David Brownstein, author of “Iodine: Why You Need It. Why You Can't Live Without It” which is now in it’s fifth edition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8Y800-xEXU

Thursday, 8 June 2023

Modified Citrus Pectin - a key supplement

I've mentioned Modified Citrus Pectin previously - see here where there is a link to a great 10 minute video with Sam Watts talking MCP.
I took this supplement but it hasn't been part of my protocol in the last couple of years. A video from Chris Wark has reminded me that it is one of the most important supplements that those of us with cancer can take.

In the video Chris interviews Dr. Eliaz, one of the world's foremost experts on galectin-3 and modified citrus pectin (MCP). As the show notes write: "Galectin-3 is an essential survival molecule in your body that when over-expressed promotes inflammation, aging, and chronic diseases like cancer. Modified citrus pectin has been scientifically proven to block its harmful effects. By disrupting galectin-3 interactions, MCP creates an environment that is inhospitable to inflammation, fibrosis, hypoxia, infection, and cancer cell growth. Modified citrus pectin has also been found to be helpful with pain relief and is known to bind to heavy metals and help remove them from the body".


I like the Cancer Choices website, as that looks at some of these treatments at a glance. They look at the science and more and score each treatment on a number of factors. In this MCP doesn't get a great reading - see here: https://cancerchoices.org/therapy/modified-citrus-pectin/

However Chris Woollams lists it as one of his top ten supplements for people with cancer: https://www.canceractive.com/article/the-top-10-cancer-fighting-supplements See more on his views here: https://www.canceractive.com/article/Modified-Citrus-Pectin,-MCP-and-cancer

Thursday, 20 April 2023

Interview with Prof Rob Thomas

This is a great overview of prostate cancer treatments (and a bit about breast) - Chris Woollams of CancerActive interviewing NHS oncologist Robert Thomas; looking at treatment protocols, hormones, lifestyle and much more. I found it a great reminder but also some stuff I didn't know.




Tuesday, 30 March 2021

Garlic - and a Wild Garlic Pesto

Yay! It is wild garlic time - some might know it as 'bear's garlic’, ‘field garlic’ and 'stinking Jenny'. It sure does give off a pungent smell. I am very fortunate to live near woods so every year it is one of those things we forage lots. 

So why here in this cancer blog? Well I just I wanted to celebrate this wonderful gift of nature. That is more than enough and I’m sure it has loads of health giving properties..I am guessing that the research hasn’t been done in any meaningful way but my gut tells me it is good! Having said that there is a fair bit of research about the positive impact of ordinary garlic and in particular one of its key compounds, an amino acid called allicin(i). 

Indeed there are several claims that cancer can play a very significant role in cancer treatment. Chris Wark of ‘Chris Beat Cancer, for example has the lemon and garlic recipe on his website (ii). There is an in vivo 2017 study (iii) and an extraordinary study by Dr Wamidh Talib with mice showing garlic and lemon can tackle cancer. Chris Warks site covers the recipe details - not something I’ve tried. Would love to hear from folks that have.

Some struggle with the idea of lots of raw garlic and resort to supplements. This maybe good but there is some evidence that many don’t have the impact we would perhaps want and are much less effective than the cloves (iv). However some companies like Allicin Max have research to support their use and are also being used in medical trials.

It’s worth mentioning that I with garlic cloves you are meant to wait 10 minutes or more after you have crushed them before you use them raw or in cooking. This time is needed to release the enzyme that produces the anti-fungal and anti-cancer compounds. 

Anyway to the recipe for pesto; well actually I’ve not really got exact measurements as have done it by feel and taste. You can see below - there are also lots of recipes online and wonderful other uses for the wild garlic.

Recipe

• 2 big handful of wild garlic (it is the leaves we eat raw or cooked - not the bulbs)
• 50gm Pinenuts (or some have used hazelnuts)
• a great dollop of cold-pressed olive oil
• yeast flakes to flavour (and great instead of cheese for those on non-dairy)
• squeeze of whole lemon juice 


Blend all ingredients together until you reach a rough, pesto-like consistency then transfer to a clean jar and cover the top of the pesto with a layer of oil to help keep it fresh. The pesto will store for a week or so but ours usually gets eaten within days. This week we had it with spirulised butternut squash and big salad. I thought a spiruliser would be one of those gadgets we would never use but it is fantastic; love spaghetti made from courgettes!

Enjoy!

Notes:


(i) See research papers like:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25586902/
And interesting discussion here from Moss Reports: https://www.mossreports.com/garlic-beats-cancer/



Tuesday, 2 March 2021

Blogs: Pfeifer Prostate Protocol, Tattoos, Helpline and an art project

Last month I was lucky to join a zoom for doctors and complementary practitioners to hear a presentation by Professor Ben L. Pfeifer, M.D., Ph.D (i). He developed a particular treatment for hormone-driven prostate cancer - a cancer that will effect as many as one in seven men in the UK and last year became the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the UK. 

I ended up writing a blog for Wigwam Cancer Support Groups - you can see it here: https://www.wigwam.org.uk/post/a-look-at-the-pfeifer-prostate-protocol

It is also worth mentioning I am helping put together weekly blog posts on the Wigwam website - in the last couple of weeks we've added blogs on:

1. A blog by a Cheltenham tattooist that I met recently; she is doing some amazing work with women that you can read about. I've also now managed to connect her with the NHS Nipple/Areola Tattoo clinics in Glos and BristolIn Glos they also use  ‘Keeping Abreast’: the Southwest Reconstruction charity who provide information, supports the Nipple/Areola Tattoo services plus gives advice regarding non-medical breast and chest wall Tattooing.

2. A blog about the Yes to Life Helpline and the info they can give regarding discounts and integrative health; they are looking for more volunteers so if interested do get in touch.

3. A blog about a beautiful magazine I came across with 'Unheard Voices' of cancer; I've been so inspired by them that we are now exploring the possibility of a similar project in Gloucestershire. If you are reading this and interested then please do get in touch.

See them all at: https://www.wigwam.org.uk/blog

Friday, 17 April 2020

Finished radiotherapy; should I continue hormones?

Ringing bell at completion of radiotherapy
 I, like many, have had a rough ride on the hormones the two times I have taken them - see previous blog here (i) and here (ii) - so have been wondering if I need to extend them beyond the end of my radiotherapy treatment. Well, for me it hinges to some extent on my diagnosis; am I high risk, as the oncologists have said or intermediate risk? Click on tab below to see other blog posts about radiotherapy, my experiences and how I managed.

Intermediate or high risk? 

Well, there are various ways that the risk has been defined but one of the most widely used is the one developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), a not-for-profit alliance of leading cancer centers. My understanding that NCCN assess as follows:

- Intermediate-risk: T2b-T2c or Gleason score = 7 or PSA 10-20μg/L.

- High-risk: cT3a, Gleason score 8-10 or PSA >20μg/L

Other organisations are similar. I was T3a with Gleason 7 (3+4) and PSA once over 20 but more recently over 10. The 3a extraprostatic extension is without seminal vesicle involvement. See great article re Gleason at: https://sperlingprostatecenter.com/gleason-grade-group-system/

The T3a puts me clearly in High Risk which my previous oncologist liked to stress at what seemed like every opportunity - was probably his concerns when I was talking about alternatives to radiotherapy. However, while my first MRI in July 2017 labelled me T3a, the MRI in January 2019, following the treatment in Germany (see about transuretheral hyperthermia here iii), reported T2c/T3a. Now put this latter figure with my Gleason and PSA and I am clearly borderline.

Update 22/5/22 - see this blog re riding the bell - a view that resonates with me: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2019/06/04/jo-taylor-its-time-to-call-time-on-the-end-of-treatment-bell/


What treatment is recommended?

I have heard that taking the hormones after radiotherapy can increase 15 year survival by 10% or more. However when I came to research it, it was not so straight forward. My current oncologist kindly supplied me with a great 18 page summary of research into hormones and radiotherapy with links to the research itself (iv). It was quite a read! And not always so easy to unpick. I also read a number of other reports by the NCCP (v) - and learnt that level one studies are the most thorough, level two the next then level three (vi). Here are some of my findings from those reports that resonated with my situation;

High-Risk Prostate Cancer - 
'Radiotherapy treatment options for patients with high-risk prostate cancer are EBRT in combination with hormonal therapy; EBRT and brachytherapy combinations; EBRT in combination with brachytherapy and hormonal therapy. (Consistent level 2 or 3 studies; or Extrapolations from level 1 studies). A combination of radiation therapy and consideration for long term hormone androgen deprivation therapy (level 1).'

Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer - 'All radiotherapy treatment options are appropriate (EBRT and/or brachytherapy) to be considered for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. (Consistent level 2 or 3 studies; or Extrapolations from level 1 studies). Hormonal therapy should be considered in addition to EBRT. (Level 1 study). Androgen; deprivation therapy for four to six months  should be  considered in conjunction with EBRT. A pooled analysis suggests that a duration of six months is optimal. (Level 1 study).'

MRI Scan Jan 2019

However the research seems to contradict itself at times. In possible contrast to the above, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 92-02 trial of T2-4 men they found that at 20 years, long-term ADT significantly increased 15-year disease-free survival with 15.7 versus 10.0 percent with short-term 4 month ADT (vii). Meanwhile a RADAR study of 1071 men showed at 10.4 years that an 18 month duration of ADT was associated with a significant reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality compared to 6 months ie 9.7 versus 13.3 percent (viii). 

Also in the report it notes: 'ADT has an established role in conjunction with EBRT for men with regionally localized high-risk prostate cancer, although its role is less well defined for those with intermediate-risk disease. EBRT for high-/very high-risk disease should always be administered with long-term ADT. Patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease can be treated with RT alone (EBRT with or without brachytherapy), but for most patients, we suggest combined RT plus ADT. Our approach is consistent with year 2018 ASCO guidelines, which advocate ADT in conjunction with EBRT (with or without brachytherapy) for men with high- or very high-risk prostate cancer but do not provide guidance on this issue for intermediate-risk disease. Consensus-based guidelines from the NCCN advocate ADT in conjunction with EBRT for men with high-risk and unfavorable  intermediate-risk disease but not for those with favorable intermediate-risk disease'

So there is a favorable and an unfavorable intermediate risk! The former possibly doing worse with ADT while the latter group doing better with ADT (ix). One report in 2016 writes: "The role and duration of ADT, however, remains a controversial issue (x)”


Indeed! More research is needed! Looking at my tests it is hard to see where I fit, as I could fall into either category although possibly more likely the less favorable; however without further tests I won’t know for sure - and I want to avoid another biopsy - see my blog (xi). Saying no now doesn’t mean I won’t use them again if needed. I am also aware that the longer you take them the less effective they are so maybe keeping them for a possible need in the future might be good? Sadly I can’t find research to indicate whether or not this might be true!
 
Update 9/09/20: well here's some research that seems to confirm my suspicions: https://www.prostatecancer.news/2020/09/adding-adt-to-external-beam-radiation.html


So I have to sit with not knowing for sure what might be best? Or do I? 

The research is not so clear but other factors also play a part - my reaction to the hormones is very strong with many side effects that significantly adversely affect my wellbeing. However key in all this for me, is intuition. See my blog from a couple of months ago here (xii). There was and is a deep knowing, that more hormones would not be best for me. Of course I discussed all this with my oncologist and she was great at listening and agreed that I was borderline. So it's no to more hormones after the radiotherapy. 

Of course I am not free for a while - the hormones do remain in the body for some months, so while my last hormone treatment of three months finished on 26th February it will be a while before I stop having those symptoms. In fact at the moment they seem to be worse as my body perhaps struggles to regulate itself?


PSA bounce and the 'nadir'? 

Bounces are periodic fluctuations to the PSA that can occur years after treatment and are not to worry about. They are seen as more than 0.2mg/nl increase but less than 2.0 ng/ml above the lowest level (nadir) it had reached thus far, followed by a decrease to as low or lower than the previous nadir - see blog to understand more at: https://pcnrv.blogspot.com/2018/03/bounces-after-primary-radiation-therapy.html

Following radiotherapy, a recurrence of prostate cancer can be defined as a PSA value of 2μg/L above the nadir after treatment. I read that it is important not to misinterpret PSA bounce as a biochemical recurrence following radiation. This phenomena tends to occur within one to two years after radiotherapy. The PSA nadir is the absolute lowest level that the PSA drops after treatment (and can take a number of years to reach). The PSA nadir can be important in further diagnosis and treatment.

Research from 1997 notes (xiii): "For possible cure of prostate cancer with radiotherapy, a prostate-specific antigen nadir of 0.5 ng/mL or less should be achieved. With this nadir level, disease freedom after irradiation is defined as achievement and maintenance of a nadir of 0.5 ng/mL or less. A nadir greater than 0.5 ng/mL or subsequent increase above 0.5 ng/mL is defined as irradiation treatment failure. This definition may help resolve the controversy about the potential for cure of prostate cancer by irradiation”.

While 2017 research notes (xiv): "Nadir PSA at 0.06 is a strong independent predictor of biochemical disease free survival (BFS) in patients with intermediate or high risk prostate cancer treated by definitive EBRT and ADT. PSA levels after ADT and EBRT were typically obtained every 4 months the first 2 years and every 6 months thereafter. These values were recorded, and the lowest PSA value attained was considered as the nadir PSA.”

Useful research update 5.6.23: PSA Nadir 6 Months After Radiotherapy Is Strongly Prognostic of Long-Term Survival in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer: https://dailynews.ascopubs.org/do/psa-nadir-6-months-after-radiotherapy-strongly-prognostic-long-term-survival-patients?


Where am I now?

Well a lot of the docs say now is the time to wait and see if the radiotherapy has worked. That doesn’t feel right to me. I’ve said before it makes no sense to me if all we do is remove the cancer - surely what caused it could still be there? I’ve also written lots about mind-body including the Bristol Whole Life Approach used at Penny Brohn to maximise our health (xv). I know that that approach will give cancer the least likely chance of it returning. So now is the time to continue to develop my protocol again - since diagnosis I have been working at many aspects including diet, exercise,  saunas and more. All that will continue and I’ve adjusted my supplement protocol in recent weeks - see below for latest. As noted previously this is always under review as I stop some, restart others and introduce new elements.


Current supplements (that I’ve written about previously; click on tag or use search box):

Probiotic x1 (where poss taken with raw veg)
Vitamin D 5,000IUs (less when we’ve had so much sun)
Turmeric x2 tablets plus some in food
Selenium x1
Milk Thistle 15 drops  x3
Solidago (just finishing)
Magnesium Citrate
Zinc
Chlorella
Green tea
Fish oil
Boron
Lecithin
Iodine drop
Boswelia
Immiflex (just restarted a course as want to keep immune system good at mo)

Just stopped these elements as bladder is so much better:
Uva Ursi
Echinacea


Poem book; different reactions to diagnosis
Side effects

As I write this it is some seven weeks since I finished radiotherapy ands I’m doing well; only slight awareness of rectal inflammation discomfort, am only going twice to the loo at night compared to eight times before so a significant improvement in the bladder inflammation, hormones are still impacting with hot flushes, muscle wastage and fatigue - of course hard to tell what is causing fatigue at the moment - is it the hormones or radiotherapy? A friend was off work for four months following his treatment. Or is it the current situation we all find ourselves in; such strange times causing stress in new ways as we face fears, new challenges at work or home and in our communities? Certainly I’m not sleeping as well at the moment despite not being woken by my bladder.


What next?

Well I want to review where I am at and look more at hormones - this is a topic I’ve come to several times but there are many questions - and am still struggling to understand! A long while back my oestrogen levels were tested privately and were high. I embarked on reducing this with supplements like indole 3 carbinol and Vitamin D and others that supports the liver.

You see as Chris Woollams writes:  "studies from Australia, Singapore, Japan and MD Anderson in Texas, which all pointed in the same direction: Namely that as a man ages, his oestrogen levels increase, while his testosterone levels decline. And this leads to an era of higher prostate cancer risk. Despite all this, current orthodox medical treatment for prostate cancer still aims to cut nasty old testosterone". You can read more in his article at: https://www.canceractive.com/article/the-reality-of-lowered-testosterone-and-higher-oestrogen-in-men-counters-orthodox-theories-of-prostate-cancer

You can also see what might help in this other article by Chris Woollams:  https://www.canceractive.com/article/natural-aromatase-inhibitors

And an interesting video looking at how DHT is protective against prostate cancer - this seems to go against some of the orthodox medical views but supports Chris Woollams approach: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69z5igxLokM

Update 24/01/22 An interesting piece of research suggests some of these new hormone treatments increase chances of depression and we know that depression is associated with worse cancer outcomes and worse survival rateshttps://www.canceractive.com/article/depression-may%20double%20with%20new%20prostate%20drugs

Notes
(ii) https://myunexpectedguide.blogspot.com/2020/03/second-round-of-hormone-treatment.html 
(iii) https://myunexpectedguide.blogspot.com/2019/06/transurethral-hyperthermia-my-experience.html 
(iv) From: Initial management of regionally localized intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk prostate cancer and those with clinical lymph node involvement (Feb 2020)
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/initial-management-of-regionally-localized-intermediate-high-and-very-high-risk-prostate-cancer-and-those-with-clinical-lymph-node-involvement

 

A look at hydrogen

Some 6 years ago I met Jan Beute and he was very persuasive about how useful hydrogen can be in treatment of cancer. See my post then:  http...