The reports include patient reported outcomes for both surgery and radiotherapy for prostate cancer. I understand that it is very unusual to see data like this where centres can be directly compared in terms of outcomes across the whole patient population, rather than just in a trial. Well here’s the website with the reports that came out last month: https://www.npca.org.uk/
See the Executive Summary plus infographic at: https://www.npca.org.uk/content/uploads/2020/01/NPCA-Annual-Report-2019_Executive-Summary-090120.pdf
You can see Gloucestershire is about average on most of the results: https://www.npca.org.uk/content/plugins/mixd-wp-audit-outcomes-npca/public/mixd-wp-audit-outcomes-pdf.php?nonce=25ffde158a&action=generate_pdf&filename=gloucestershire-hospitals-nhs-foundation-trust&orientation=portrait×pan=2017-2018
The figures show numbers of men in various stages of prostate cancer and impact after treatment, for example the proportion of patients who experienced a severe gastrointestinal complication with 2 years of radical radiotherapy is around 10% in Glos.
You can see Gloucestershire is about average on most of the results: https://www.npca.org.uk/content/plugins/mixd-wp-audit-outcomes-npca/public/mixd-wp-audit-outcomes-pdf.php?nonce=25ffde158a&action=generate_pdf&filename=gloucestershire-hospitals-nhs-foundation-trust&orientation=portrait×pan=2017-2018
The figures show numbers of men in various stages of prostate cancer and impact after treatment, for example the proportion of patients who experienced a severe gastrointestinal complication with 2 years of radical radiotherapy is around 10% in Glos.
I wonder how Glos interprets these results and what they might mean for investment. I would be interested to hear more.
No comments:
Post a Comment