|
Paul Leendertse |
I have read a little about the New German Medicine (NGM) approach to cancer - I hugely welcome the way it looks at cancer not as an arbitrary illness but rather a biologically meaningful response to emotional shocks. I love that it looks at the mind body connection and it's possible role in cancer. However quite a bit of it hasn't sat right with me.There are various sources online for folks to explore NGM - here's one whole book that I was sent to review: https://madeongaia.is/signup_files/GNM-Disease-Clarity.pdf In this they look at the work of Dr Hamer, the originator of NGM, and at particular cancers and causes; prostate cancer, for example, one of the suggestions is that it maybe due to a 'procreation conflict' when the man is unable to father children!
Another book I reviewed before it went to final publication with a number of changes last year was 'Terminal Cancer is a Misdiagnosis' by Danny Carroll. Again this is based on the work of Dr Hamer with some 50,000 patients. As some will know he was given a 19 month prison sentence in Germany for the 'illegal practice of medicine' - this was despite supporters noting that his 'medical research findings' showed an 85% survival rate with his patients who refused conventional medical treatments.
Just this week I was pointed to a webinar where Paul Leenderertse from the Root Cause Institute looks critically at NGM and also shares his own work - he writes: "The Root Cause is a psycho-emotional stress complex, effecting the physical body, which needs to be identified and resolved to heal." I like his approach - he says the 'tumour is there for a reason' - 'it's not just stress it's the suppression of emotions' - 'it's blocking us from spiritual growth, we're getting stuck in it and if we are not growing and learning we're dying'. For me there is clearly a role for emotions but suspect it is more than just that.
Interestingly Paul also notes a role of fungus - something that Mark Lintern's theory considers may play a part in cancer. This is not something new but has been around on the fringes of cancer research - the evidence from Mark is certainly compelling.
No comments:
Post a Comment